And Another Thing… by Eoin Colfer

Site menu

You are here:

Subscribe

Mostly Harmless is mostly underrated

I’ve long held the opinion, counter to the general current of thought, that Mostly Harmless is the best of Douglas Adams’s Hitchhiker books.

My reasons are these:

  1. It has a coherent plot that is driven by real motivations. For example, Random is created because Arthur is trying desperately to find Fenchurch in space and time, and because Trillian is too busy getting on with her career to have a meaningful relationship (I’m trying not to drop too many spoilers here). These things hang together really well!

  2. There is character development for Arthur, Random and even The Guide. It’s not just about the amazing concepts and hilarious jokes; it’s about people too.

  3. There are some clever, dramatic reversals of familiar ideas from the series. E.g. PANIC instead of DON’T PANIC.
  4. The ending has Wagnerian dimensions (and lots of other dimensions too).

  5. There are still lots of very good jokes – the philosophical bits on the planet Hawalius are hilarious.

Now, before you start shouting, I freely admit that books one to four in the trilogy have some of these elements too. My simple point, however, is that in none of them do all the elements come together in such a…a…writerly fashion as in Mostly Harmless.

I know it’s sad and depressing and people sometimes dislike it, but I love it.

Also, I feel more emotionally attached to Mostly Harmless because it was the only book in the trilogy that I ANTICIPATED (feverishly). I came to the series late in life (I was thirteen, but I’d had since I was 2 years old to read them and just hadn’t bothered) and so books 1-4 were already published and available in a neat sort of jigsaw puzzle paperback edition, where you could rearrange the covers into four different pictures. And then a fifth book was coming and the big question in my mind was: How will they change the puzzles to accommodate another book? And, of course, they didn’t. But the cover was brilliant anyway.

  1. Interestingly, I came to DNA and H2G2 very late in life – only about ten years ago, after my own teenage sons had turned me onto something I’d missed first time around.

    I’ve just re-read all five in quick succession – in preparation for reading No.6, and I have to say, I agree with you about Mostly Harmless being perhaps the best. The plot of the original is such a piece of folklore now, that it has it’s own timeless qualities, but No.5 is more rounded piece of writing.
    1, 5, 4, 2, 3 in order of merit I’d say.

  2. Mostly Harmless was a great book. Better than So Long and Thanks for all the Fish was, at least.

  3. I’ll tackle your points one at a time.

    1. It does not have a coherent plot. Any plot that relies on multiple alternative realities and the actions of beings with god-like powers in order to find a resolution isn’t well plotted.

    2. There is no character development for anyone. They are a mess at the beginning, they are a mess at the end, with nary a difference in between. And they’re dead.

    3. Saying “Panic” instead of “Don’t Panic” is a perfect example of an author hitting his own panic button because he can’t think of anything truly original to say.

    4. It’s a brave man who can claim that a “Wagnerian” end is a good thing, especially a Wagnerian end to a comedy series.

    5. There aren’t that many good jokes and even fewer memorable ones. The sandwich maker is the high point – and it comes right at the beginning.

    You are, of course, free to enjoy “Mostly Harmless”, but there’s a reason it is generally disliked to the point that even Adams himself wanted to basically retract it with a more appropriate sixth book. I, myself, don’t even allow my copy to sit on my shelf of “Hitchhiker” material. It didn’t earn it.

  4. Well, I think all the hitchhiker’s books are fantastic…. and yeah, i know “Mostly Harmless” is not the kind of book you’d expect as a finale… but i still love it… and for those out there who says the books messed up…. well, the whole series is about messes… rather unfortunate, hillarious messes, but still messes… kudos to adams, may god rest his blessed soul!

  5. I absolutely agree with the sentiment, I would even go as far as saying that it’s my favourite right after book 1 (and 2 which you could consider as a direct continuation.) The end is kind of a shocker but it works very well, and Ford’s meeting with Van Harl is my favourite part in all five books.

    The low point for me actually, was – the fourth book! Surprised? First, it did not feel like a HHG book at all – it happened on Earth, it had none of the characters apart from Arthur up to the end, Marvin is killed off, and not only does it not resolve any plot points but actually creates more – note what you’d expect from a book that was supposed to be the last. The Fenchurch romance was unfunny or too clever as well.

    So I was glad that it explained the Earth’s back plothole away right at the beginning with the parallel Earths idea and returned to the old space-travelling humor routine. For me it worked much better as an ending.

    Also…no offense Philip but if that’s your idea of refuting…I mean you really should offer some good points, not just a “no no no”? (Also if you call the book a mess, I wonder what we should call book 2 or 3 which are even more random…)

    I imagine that most people just don’t like it because of the deaths. Oh well, downer endings are not for everyone.

  6. I don’t think it’s the best book, but it’s not the worse. For some reason I’m the only earthman to think the worst book in the series was The Restaurant at the End of the Universe. I really love the third and fifth books.
    My girlfriend does think Mostly Harmless is the best one.

Comments are turned off for this article.

Staff writer avatar

Ricoeurian

I arrived on the B ark and have been struggling to make a living ever since. I've tried book selling, book reviewing, book writing and book reading (sometimes simultaneously). Now I work for Pan Macmillan, where we make books, including those written by Douglas Adams 30 years ago (and more recently). I first read the Hitchhiker books when I was thirteen years old, then again when I was seventeen years old, and twenty-four, and most recently at thirty-one and a half. I will read them again when I turn forty-two (and possibly even sooner than that).

View all Ricoeurian posts

Contributors

We've teamed up with a range of fans and groups to bring you the latest stuff on Hitchhiker. Find out who they all are here.

Site map

And Another Thing…

Read all about the latest book in the Hitchhiker's series.

Events

Advance warnings of Hitchhiker's events around the globe.

Competitions

Game

The Vogon training objective… destroy Earth now! Resistance is useless!